Member-only story

Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: Rethinking Habermas in the Global Age

Henry Green

·8.6k Followers· Follow

Published in Transnationalizing The Public Sphere Nancy Fraser

5 min read · 1 week before

1k View Claps

69 Respond

Save

Listen

Nancy Fraser's 'Transnationalizing the Public Sphere' is a major work of political theory that challenges the classic theory of the public sphere developed by Jürgen Habermas. Fraser argues that Habermas's theory is too narrow and fails to account for the global interconnectedness of contemporary societies. She proposes a new framework for understanding the public sphere in the global age, one that is more inclusive and more responsive to the challenges of our time.

Habermas's theory of the public sphere is based on the idea that there is a space in society where citizens can come together to debate and discuss issues of public concern. This space is independent from the state and from private interests, and it is essential for the functioning of a democratic society.

Habermas identifies two key features of the public sphere:

Transnationalizing the Public Sphere

by Nancy Fraser

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1212 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	178 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

Autonomy. The public sphere is autonomous from the state and from private interests. This means that citizens are free to express their opinions without fear of censorship or reprisal.
Inclusiveness. The public sphere is open to all citizens, regardless of their social status or economic background. This means that everyone has the opportunity to participate in public debate and to have their voices heard.

Fraser argues that Habermas's theory of the public sphere is too narrow and fails to account for the global interconnectedness of contemporary societies. She points out that the public sphere is not simply a national space, but a transnational one. Citizens are increasingly connected to each other across bFree Downloads, and they share common concerns that cannot be addressed within the confines of a single nation-state.

Fraser also argues that Habermas's theory is too exclusive. She points out that the public sphere is often dominated by white, middle-class men. This means that the voices of women, minorities, and the poor are often marginalized or excluded.

Fraser proposes a new framework for understanding the public sphere in the global age. She argues that the public sphere is a transnational space that is open to all citizens, regardless of their social status or economic background. This space is essential for the functioning of a democratic society, and it is the site where citizens can come together to debate and discuss issues of public concern.

Fraser identifies three key features of the transnational public sphere:

Transnationalism. The transnational public sphere is open to all citizens, regardless of their national bFree Downloads. This means that citizens can participate in public debate and have their voices heard across bFree Downloads.
Inclusiveness. The transnational public sphere is open to all citizens, regardless of their social status or economic background. This means that everyone has the opportunity to participate in public debate and to have their voices heard.
Deliberation. The transnational public sphere is a space where citizens can come together to deliberate on issues of public concern. This means that citizens can exchange ideas, listen to each other, and come to a common understanding of the issues at hand.

Fraser's book is a timely and important contribution to the study of democracy and the public sphere. It is a must-read for anyone interested in the future of democratic politics in the 21st century.

Transnationalizing the Public Sphere

by Nancy Fraser

5 out of 5